Form 5: Assessment of the Board by FARA Management

CRITERIA
WEIGHT
RATING
REMARKS
1. Board Directors are well acquainted with FARA, i.e. they:
• Understand its values, mandate and strategic direction
• Are sufficiently informed about issues concerning FARA
• Maintain good lines of communication with their constituencies regarding FARA business
2.0
Please enter a number from 1 to 5.
2. Directors are aware of their oversight role and Management’s expectations of them. They focus on strategic issues and engage at an oversight level not management / operational level
1.0
Please enter a number from 1 to 5.
3. Directors commit adequate time to the Board’s business and are sufficiently prepared for Board meetings
1.0
Please enter a number from 1 to 5.
4. The Board works constructively with the Secretariat’s Management to support and critique it in order to assure high performance.
2.0
Please enter a number from 1 to 5.
5. Board Directors effectively advance perspectives of constituencies they represent to assure the Secretariat’s work is relevant to those constituencies
1.0
Please enter a number from 1 to 5.
6. Directors are supportive and leverage their influence and social capital to advance the Secretariat’s work, e.g. advocacy, resource mobilisation, partnerships, etc.
2.0
Please enter a number from 1 to 5.
7. The Board has the right mix of competencies, perspectives, representation and diversity
1.0
Please enter a number from 1 to 5.
TOTAL SCORE (Max - 50)
EX: Excellent G: Good S: Satisfactory US: Unsatisfactory UA: Unacceptable
X